Was Joe Cole wrong to leave West Ham in the first place?

When Joe Cole left West Ham in 2003, it was apparent that he left the club he had been at since he was 13 because they were relegated.

In the 2002-03 season, the Irons had current Premier League players like Michael Carrick and Glen Johnson as well as club legend Paolo Di Canio, but they couldn’t stay up. The latter two left in the summer of 2003 and Joe Cole followed.

Cole went on to win 10 trophies in 7 seasons at Chelsea, but he rarely played in the role he enjoyed at West Ham, and he was never really able to replicate the performances he showed – the same sort of performances that he had earned rave reviews for as a teenager.

He left Chelsea after falling out of favour and joined Liverpool on a free transfer, but his time at there was somewhat torrid. He got sent off in his first game for the Reds and didn’t play enough in his first season to show people what a quality player he can be, he was then loaned out to Lille in 2011 and managed to boost his reputation a little bit.

Sadly for Joe, a permanent deal couldn’t be agreed and he went back to Liverpool at the end of the 2011-12 season. Only 2 goals in 11 appearances this season for a player like Cole simply isn’t good enough and his lethargic performances were what forced him out of the Anfield exits and towards the place it all began for Cole; West Ham.

This leads to me to question - Why did he leave West Ham in the first place?

Obviously the appeal of European football helped him to decide that he wanted to move to Chelsea, but I think he moved too soon in his career. We’ll never know if he would have helped the Irons achieve promotion at the first time of asking, but the money Hammers gained from his transfer helped to make up for the monetary losses suffered because of relegation.

Cole will be welcomed with open arms by the West Ham fans, there is no doubt about that, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends his career at the club. I don’t think he will get in the starting 11 ahead of Kevin Nolan, but Sam Allardyce’s faith in Ricardo Vaz Te will be tested with Joe Cole at the club as the right midfield position is most likely where he will play.

Vaz Te has been somewhat inconsistent so far this season, but the arrival of Joe Cole could be the kick up the backside he needs to get him into gear. He might have more of a chance of playing now that Yossi Benayoun has left the club, but the 31 year old can’t expect to walk into the team just because he’s Joe Cole.

Thomas Baxter 

Follow @footyfriends

Comments

[JohnF]

Joe Cole actually improved at Chelsea. JM helped his overall game and he scored many crucial goals. His goal against ManU in the 3-0 win that secured the title in 2005-06 was sublime. Her had to compete with Robben and Duff for a place in JM's side, but he did well at Chelsea until serious injuries took their toll.

[Andy]

I think many players who have left West Ham have not really produced the sort of form they did when they were at West Ham purely and simply because they go to big clubs with massive squads so when you look at the likes of Scotty Parker, Joe Cole great players and play makers have always played their best Football at Upton Park. Scotty Parker had a regular 9 in ratings and now he hardly plays for Spurs, Joe Cole left West Ham and went to Chelsea although he played well for a while he was then dumped on the Bench then ended up at Liverpool again same thing happened. He then ended up on Loan at Lille in France before resigning for his beloved West Ham where I think he will regain his form and play for England once more because he will not be dumped on the Bench and left to rot bench warmers will not be recognized for England that is a Fact. Big spending Clubs who buy every player in site do not do our England squad players any favors that is also a Fact. My Advice to these great players is stay where you can both keep fit and play your best regular Football . Big pay day clubs Spoil your International Chances and also your form.