POPULAR NEWS

This area does not yet contain any content.
MORE FOOTBALL BLOGS
    WRITE FOR FF

    « Gunners’ town’s articles of the week | Main | Can Spurs really be London's best in 2012? »

    Reader Comments (10)

    If it were up to me, I'd have Nani starting, without a shadow of a doubt. He's got amazing skills, and has many weapons we could use in our game. He can run past players for fun, shoot with both feet, boasts a decent goal-scoring record, could cause havoc by cutting inside and playing deeper, could easily swith flanks and look rather natural on the left (although I prefer seeing him on the right flank). These are all things Valencia can not do as well. Valencia is more of a single-dimensional player. He's quick and can cross well. Pretty effective at times, but Nani is the full package. When we need penetration, Nani has the 'can opener' as Sir Alex may say. That's mainly why I prefer him.

    Granted, when Nani is off, he is way off. At times he could frustrate everyone, the gaffer, the supporters, his teammates and even himself. Still, I prefer him being the one who starts games on wide right. If things aren't going well, we could always bring Valencia on for him in the second half. I remember Milan two seasons ago when Valencia came on for Nani and tore them apart for example.

    I think Valencia is a good player, but Nani is just amazing - a truly great player, individually. I believe Nani is the best choice to start almost every game. Of course, Valencia is a very good substitute for him, and we could always rotate between the two, but Nani has to be the number 1 choice, in my opinion.

    NANI every time. Only had to watch Valencia in CL final against Barca to see - he can't cut it against top defenders. Valencia couldn't beat his last defender, and got zero crosses into the box. Anybody think Valencia would have done what Nani did against City at Wembley and get the2 fantastic goals to win the game and send United fans home happy and with bragging rights. Or would Vally have scored the important goal against Chelsea in our game recently? Vally has his assets that's for sure - not trying to say he hasn't. I suppose it all depends whether you like the exciting flair, giving us the unexpected like Nani, or the more workmanlike, matter of fact winger like Vally. Me I lovethe Nani's of the football world!

    NANI every time. Only had to watch Valencia in CL final against Barca to see - he can't cut it against top defenders. Valencia couldn't beat his last defender, and got zero crosses into the box. Anybody think Valencia would have done what Nani did against City at Wembley and get the2 fantastic goals to win the game and send United fans home happy and with bragging rights. Or would Vally have scored the important goal against Chelsea in our game recently? Vally has his assets that's for sure - not trying to say he hasn't. I suppose it all depends whether you like the exciting flair, giving us the unexpected like Nani, or the more workmanlike, matter of fact winger like Vally. Me I lovethe Nani's of the football world!

    Nani is a much better pleyer comparing to Valencia. Valencia may be quick but seems doesn't know how to use his pace effectively. Valencia may be considered as a good attacker, but not a great one and simply not good enough to beat top clas defender (Left Back).

    Nani is arguably one of the current best players at Old-Trafford really (along with Rooney). He can beat defenders with his skills and tricks. If Nani improve the quality of his final ball (shoot and pass), he can be a better play than Ronaldo.

    Why cant we use both, with Valencia at full back. His work rate is very good and having both nani and valencia charging the same side of the field would be daunting for most teams. De silva is too hot headed and gets himself booked to easily. So i say use both Nani and Valencia!

    in all honesty i feel fergie doesnt use Nani as much.There is no comparison between NANI and Valencia.Nani is the better player hands down.

    i think nani shuold, because he does have quite a few assets in his sleeve. the problem is.. valencia is too one footed. thats why i would prefer Nani. Also, as you said, he can change positions with ashley young, where it gives defenders a problem bcause once the defenders get used to how the winger plays in that game, the winger might be defended really easily. However, if they cahnge it, the changes hte paces of both sides and defenders find it a problem.

    Valencia is better than Nani

    Nani is well trusted and Valencia has returned from number of injurys. Nani is well fit to , he can run pass anyone he wants and has develped very well at the team. Valencia is making more mistakes then any one else, maybe because his playing in a very unfamiliar position to him because his a winger and he is playing as a right back. I like Valencia but Nani has so many skills that you can't ignore, but Valencia's passes are fantastic,he can cross a ball right into your head. Rooney has scored so many goals because of his crosses (said that on an interview) in 2009 2010 season and it proves ya what Valencia is capable of great things. Nani can do everything in the right time, score goals and assisit them as well and his speciality is shooting a stoner.many people are comparing him to Cristiano Ronaldo and Sir Alex has said that Nani is here to replace Ronaldo.so i cleary prefer Nani instead of Valencia but it's Sir Alex decision.

    i prefere nani ciz of his attacking ability

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.